Story image

Uber, Airbnb and the problem with South Africa's sharing economy

02 Nov 17

As people become more comfortable with using service driven platforms such as Uber and Airbnb, their popularity has grown both internationally and in South Africa.

The ease and convenience of these services has been one of the biggest draw cards for the public and has caused huge growth for the online service industry.

Two of the most popular services are Airbnb and Uber. Airbnb has been available in South Africa since 2010 and Uber came to the country in 2014. In less than 5 years, both of these services have become part of everyday South African life, but their rise has not been without difficulties, locally and internationally.

In September 2017, it was announced that Uber’s private hire licence as a ride-hauling app would not be renewed in London.

This came as a shock as it is estimated that Uber in London serviced more than 3.5 million people and around 40,000 people are licenced to drive Uber vehicles.

Another ride hauling app service, Taxify, from Estonia, also needed to halt their services in London only three days after launching because of the same licensing problem in the city.

In South Africa, Uber claimed to have made over 2 million trips in 2015, only a year after launching in the country. However, in that same year and the following one, over 200 cars were impounded in the city of Cape Town because of operating licensing irregularities.

In July of this year, the Minister of Transport Joe Maswanganyi once again called for Uber drivers to apply for public transport licenses, like other metered taxis.

Despite Airbnb’s success in South Africa it has also been facing similar regulation problems lately. According to the Airbnb Citizens platform, Airbnb contributed an estimated R2.4 billion to the South African economy in 2016.

In Cape Town, Johannesburg and Durban the Airbnb Citizens platform estimate that R1.9 billion has been added to the three city’s economies combined last year. From a tech business standpoint, launching a similar online service company seems very profitable indeed, however its regulation and technology are bumping heads more and more.

Cape Town Tourism recently called Airbnb a “disruptive industry” and the service has even been referred to as “illegal” by mayoral committee member, Brett Herron.

One of the problems that has come to light recently is that Airbnb owners are renting out their houses without having these properties properly registered as Guest Houses or Hotels.

Under the Cape Town City’s Guest Accommodation Policy, a bed and breakfast does not require any registration with the Tourism Board as it may only consist of 3 rooms and not more than 6 paying guests. This allows people to generate income from small bed and breakfast operations in the city.

However, when the number of rooms and people exceed this limit, the house must be registered.

Regulations such as these have helped the city of Cape Town grow its tourism industry and ensure that the city is able to provide proper infrastructure to registered holiday accommodation, however the rising popularity of Airbnb has been named as a cause for soaring house prices in the city.

Despite the popularity of these online service platforms, they are facing a big barrier to continue their entry into some of the biggest cities in the country. Taxify has not yet taken off in South Africa, however billboards have gone up all around Johannesburg. They will more than likely face the same backlash on licensing regulations as Uber has.

If Airbnb and Uber is anything to go by, regulations by major cities could be a minefield for similar online service platforms looking to enter the market soon. These are disruptive services.

The problem could lie not with the companies themselves, but rather with the individuals offering these services to the public.

The regulations that need to be prescribed to when offering services to the public differs in every country.

Despite technology companies such as these Airbnb and Uber providing their patrons with regulations on how to offer their services according to their company regulations, the country regulations might not always be taken into consideration by the companies themselves.

This can unfortunately lead to these services being defined under a blanket “illegal” term, which is not the business intention of these companies.

Nowadays, companies can trade almost anywhere in the world, however country policies still differ.

Technology companies working with patrons offering services via their platforms, need to investigate the country regulations they are entering into and make their patrons aware of them.

If not, it will become a lose-lose venture for both the company and the patron in the long run.

Gartner names Proofpoint Leader in enterprise information archiving
The report provides a detailed overview of the enterprise information archiving market and evaluates vendors based on completeness of vision and ability to execute.
QNAP introduces new 10GbE and Thunderbolt 3 NAS series
The new series is supposedly an all-in-one NAS solution for file storage, backup, sharing, synchronisation and centralised management. 
Tensions on the rise after Huawei CFO arrest
“Recently our corporate CFO, Meng Wanzhou, was provisionally detained by the Canadian authorities on behalf of the United States of America."
CyrusOne investing in new Amsterdam data centre
CyrusOne is continuing its rapid and relentless investment into Europe, with news emerging of a new facility in the Netherlands.
HPE to supply tech to Formula E racing team
“At HPE, we believe the future belongs to the fast, and we’re focused on accelerating what’s next for enterprises, including in the world of auto racing."
Why the future of IT infrastructure is always on and always available
As more organisations embrace digital business, infrastructure and operations leaders will need to evolve their strategies and skills to keep up.
Digital transformation in Europe a €333b business
IDC has shared its forecast for digital transformation spending in Europe, which looks to be a very profitable industry.
Is the on-premises data centre really going to ‘die’?
Gartner certainly thinks so, as it expects the sheer majority of enterprises to have binned their on-premises facility by 2025.